Re: PPC/PPC64 disabled in Koji for dist-f13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I would rather the problem be approached in a logical, 
scalable fashion: 
> by distributing the workload across the package maintainers 
who have 
> firsthand knowledge.  ie. how things worked before.
PPC hardware isn't exactly common these days. I'm sure there are 
a few machines on campus that have PPC (there are definitely 
SPARC workstations sprinkled around). As it stands, I have no 
useful access to any of the machines (I guess a Live CD could 
get some special access, though at what cost to my status as a 
student, I don't know).

> But you're dodging the larger point -- Fedora has, de facto, 
demoted big 
> endian support in its entirety to a second-hand effort, rather 
than 
> distributed the workload much more widely.  Given M package 
maintainers 
> and N secondary-platform volunteers, it is clear M > N by 
orders of 
> magnitude.
> 
> Given that ppc32 and ppc64 (or pick your BE platform) have 
demonstrated 
> an ability to detect problems not found on LE, it seems like 
this policy 
> change will directly lead to missed bugs, and an attendent 
decline in 
> software quality.
> 
> Was ppc really such a burden?
> 
> 	Jeff

Build times were the worst part of it IMO. With how it was set 
up (ppc being default even on ppc64) ppc64 could have been 
dropped and ppc be left intact.

- --Ben
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
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=MGWo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux