On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 07:46, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Leonard den Ottolander (leonard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Since up2date on FC has no longer anything to do with the Red Hat > > Network I was wondering why the relevant configuration directory in > > /etc/sysconfig is still called rhn. Isn't it time to change that into > > up2date instead? Maybe keep a compatibility symlink around for one > > release or so? > > It would have to be a configure option, since it's certainly > still built with RHN support. As such, I'm not sure it's worth it. > > Bill Bill, maybe a configure option to build for RHEL or FC _would_ be reasonable? I mean, the up2date package contains many RHN components that are not appropriate for FC and in some cases are quite confusing; such as people thinking they still have to register with RHN. Is it not possible to strip all RHN components from the Fedora build of up2date? Matt -- Registered Linux User #348963 / counter.li.org GnuPG KeyID: 0xCE9F8922 / gnupg.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
