On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Would it not be best to have the default package using the default > CFLAGS for consistency with the rest of the distribution, and the > subpackages being variants which override the CFLAGS? > This is a different issue altogether. Even if atlas is made to used the default CFLAGS, it will still attempt to build for a particular CPU (either for the archictetural default passed to it at build time or the hardware on which it is being built), that's how the package was designed. Deji > Jonathan > > ps. Any recent thoughts on BZ 478856? > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
