Re: Opinions on packaging ATLAS (for the x86 architecture)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Jonathan Underwood
<jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Would it not be best to have the default package using the default
> CFLAGS for consistency with the rest of the distribution, and the
> subpackages being variants which override the CFLAGS?
>
This is a different issue altogether. Even if atlas is made to used
the default CFLAGS, it will still attempt to build for a particular
CPU (either for the archictetural default passed to it at build time
or the hardware on which it is being built), that's how the package
was designed.

Deji
> Jonathan
>
> ps. Any recent thoughts on BZ 478856?
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux