On 09/23/2009 10:05 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jonathan Dieter (jdieter@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> The second one has to do with the fact that when rebuilding the rpms, we >> have to recompress the data, and xz compression is over 10x slower than >> gzip. > > Stats of the day... > > I took an existing xz-compressed RPM, and built a newer release of that > package with varying xz levels. The numbers are: > > - the new package size at that XZ compression level > - the time to create a new deltarpm from a delta to that new version > One further question -- where does libz compression fit into these stats? -Toshio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
