2009/9/24 Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > That is not the issue. There are two issues: > > - Compressing a file on different arches, while it produces output > that any arch can decompress, does produce *different* output. > - Compression of xz is not fast. > So long as RPM is not rebuilt on client's computer, xz is definitely a favorable choice: less download, fast decompression. What about to rebuild unzipped RPM on client's computer, and compare its signature with pre-calculated one? It should be fast on server side (pre-calculate signature for all drpm is too slow, as seth said.) -- bbbush ^_^ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
