On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 12:11:25PM -0500, Michael Favia wrote: > I would love to see some of your suggestions implemented. I was thinking > the same thing just yesterday. I dont know if it would ease or trouble > the developent of the next FC but i like the idea of a distribution that > incorporates the newer "addon" packages and stabalizes the core desktop > environment (a sane technology testing platform if you will). I thought > this was the charter of FC to begin with. Is it simply too time > consuming to do this from redhats end (completely understandable if so)? That's my understanding on where we want to go and I hope we make good progress with this. FC1 has been very solid in my opinion. FC2 has kind of rough corners with the big step to a 2.6 kernel and the starting point to update many user level rpms plus really adding into a solid desktop. Current FC3 looks nice to me, but I might be the wrong person to ask this. (I tend to like all development trees.;-) For your above comments: I'd wish system-config-packages plus some other tools would be more connected and working better together. I am not sure all that can be cleaned up within FC3 development timeframe. It's a huge area to work on. The new repository support just going into the Fedora development tree are again bits of this. greetings, Florian La Roche
