Re: yum-presto not on by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, drago01 wrote:

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, drago01 wrote:

Does not matter which compression algorithm we use creating a
compressed rpm just to uncompressed it again shortly after that is a
waste of cycles/power/time.

As for the GPG signature ... can't the drpm itself be signed?

We'd need to do that signing which would take, umm, forever.

What? You mean at compose time? (Signing on the client side would not
make much sense)

I mean on the server/repo side. The steps we'd need to do for a full release would be:

1. compose tree
2. sign pkgs in tree
3. make deltarpms of pkgs vs older tree
4. sign deltarpms
5. generate repository metadata

that would take a long time.

-sv

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux