Re: Xinetd resurrection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/20/2009 06:28 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:

Not at all. These days the only need for xinetd is in memory constrained
systems. For mainline x86_64 bought with typically 4Gb of main memory, xinetd
is a thing of the past. That's my point.

Well, I am probably part of that 0.000001% who would like some services to start on-demand. For example I don't print all the time and I prefer to have cups start only when needed, then die instead of having it waiting for no real purpose. Now, this is a case in which it doesn't make sense (you start xinetd instead of cups for no real gain) but it can be useful with some setups.

Even if I have a quad-core system with 4Gb of memory available I always prefer to find a better use for it.

--
Lorenzo V.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux