On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 23:38 +0100, Quentin Armitage wrote: > My Rawhide system has rhpl version 0.221-1.i586 installed. The current > version in Rawhide is 0.220-2.i686, and so it appears that the version > number in Rawhide is behind that in F11. Looks like a change was committed to the F-11 branch but not the devel branch. I've fixed this. > > Is there further an issue here, and also with some other packages, where > the Fedora version is not included in the package name, since it appears > to me it would be possible for package names to be duplicated, one for > example from F11 and one from Rawide/F12? dist tag is not requires. Those that choose not to use the dist tag choose to manage version-release themselves in such a way to not have conflicts. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
