Re: Xinetd resurrection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan Zeleny (jzeleny@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> I'm current maintainer of xinetd in Fedora. Lately I've been inspecting some 
> major patches and I was informed that upstream is pretty much dead. I think 
> this project is interesting and it's worth to try to resurrect it.
> 
> My plan is to start project on fedora hosted and basically rebuild the whole 
> source code, so it is more clean and can be extended/maintained easily if 
> needed.
> 
> I already have one developer, who is willing to join me. I'd like to know your 
> opinion of this project. And of course if there is anybody who would like to 
> join, just let me know, I'd be happy to gather some more people to work on 
> this.

Active, available maintainers are generally a good thing. I wouldn't worry
much about extending it - it's essentially legacy code at this point.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux