On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I'd imagine that running the "live Anaconda" UI from inside the GDM X >> session wouldn't take significantly more resources than the Anaconda >> OS after creating an image that doesn't have games, etc. > > Images sound significantly more difficult to create and maintain than > kickstart-files. > > I would really hate to lose kickstart. No one's suggesting replacing kickstart, actually I think we way undersell it. What I'm talking about is the mode where the image boots directly into Anaconda as a complete OS should instead be a live image with Anaconda as an application, which for the most part would be the same except you'd gain the ability to run say Firefox (or any other app; games), or do "yum install" during the install. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
