On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 01:27 -0400, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Boy, I'm so glad we decided to jump onto the xz ship. > > > I take it it's too late to back out and stick to bzip2 until the > situation stabilizes? I take it whatever solution ends up in F-12 is > likely to be the one used by RHEL 6 when it comes out next spring. > > Between using more space on a distribution that's smaller than Fedora > anyway, and having a rather uncertain compression tool... It's only 'uncertain' in the sense that it's not committed to always producing the same archive in future versions or on different architectures. As has been pointed out, this only has any relevance when it comes to delta RPMs, which are hardly a vital case (it's not catastrophic if they don't work). There's no suggestion that the tool is 'uncertain' in any more important sense (i.e. it doesn't actually compress / decompress properly). It isn't. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
