Paul W. Frields said the following on 09/14/2009 05:23 AM Pacific Time:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:51:09PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
Today was the first of many exciting blocker bug review meetings in
anticipation of the Fedora 12 Beta release. Thanks to everyone who
filed bugs and participated in the discussion. I think we saw a much
smoother release (or at least less surprises) of the Fedora 12 Alpha by
doing these reviews each week. Hopefully the same will be true for the
Beta and final release!
I wanted to suggest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518880
as a candidate for blocker status, because it's a regression in a
well-publicized feature. (The maintainers are already aware of the
problem and working on it, I'd just like to make sure it's not lost in
the shuffle.)
That criterion is worth considering generally for blocker status. But
maybe it needs some refinement?
I see that it is on F12Target, but I still think it could get lost in
the shuffle as we don't review that list at the blocker meetings.
I'll move it to blocker so it at least gets discussed and tracked
closer... with the understanding that it might be removed later.
John
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
