On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:37:59AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> This was discussed a couple of days ago against another rawhide >> report. I would check out the list archives for the reasoning. > > I fail to find it. :-( The last report in the old format was 20090902 > and I did not find any discussion looking back up to 20090811. This is > somehow strange again, because I would expected to also receive an > announcement if the report format is changed, e.g. I just assumed that > the script was somehow broken, because it did not report any new > packages anymore or something else. I did not bother to scoll beyond the > broken dependencies, because I do not really care to read them. If my > package has a broken dependency, I get a personal e-mail. Sorry was fedora-test list. gmail merges them http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2009-September/msg00143.html Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
