On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 08:56 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote: > On 09/09/09 08:17, mike cloaked wrote: > > Bob Arendt wrote: > > > >> Try using /sbin/dosfslabel or /sbin/e2label to read the actual label. > >> Then use that for the label on the boot line. > > > > Bingo! That works - excellent - I think I will add this to the > > reference page - others will doubtless be bitten by this also. > > Now I hope I can test later this evening.... > > > > mike > > > Glad it helped. I tried out the Snapshot 1 liveusb, and > was puzzled when it didn't work; My original post to > those bugs was based on /sbin/dosfslabel (it was a vfat stick). > > I'm curious - what *was* the label reported? How did you > create your live boot? I'd used the "livecd-iso-to-disk" > tool, latest F11 version to put the live iso's on to a USB > stick .. and ended up with labels "F12-i686" and "F12-x86_64". > > Some tool somewhere is mucking this up. I don't know if > it's the .iso creation on the fedoraproject side, or the > livecd-iso-to-disk from the livecd-tools package (or some > sort of tool inconsistency). livecd-iso-to-disk is the culprit, we believe. I already filed a bug on this when I hit it during an earlier test event (dracut). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520207 (I know you've found out about this, but posting for the benefit of the list :>) I cleaned up the warning note on the Wiki page - but thanks for adding it, guys, helped a lot of people while I was still asleep :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
