Re: [PATCH 3/3] dracut has initrd-generic-<version> instead of initrd-<version> (#519185)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:45:43PM -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
> On 09/04/2009 12:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Isn't the point of the new infrastructure that we can provide multiple
>> initramfs modules that will all end up in the filesystem on boot? Users
>> who want to add drivers could do it even more easily than they currently
>> can.
>>
>
> I am skeptical that we are ready for this.  Not all non-x86 boot loaders  
> are capable of handling multiple initrd's, and various types of netboot  
> wont do it either.  This is a very late time to rely upon such a new  
> feature for something this important.

cpio archives can be concatenated, right? It seems like a 
straightforward workaround.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux