Jeffrey Ollie <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I plan on getting an update to Asterisk out ASAP, but it's taking > _forever_ to rebuild the git repository that I use to maintain the > various patches. I'll do a quick rebuild with the attached patch so > I'm not blocking the openssl update. Is it really worth maintaining a significant amount of patches? With my private build of 1.6.1.6 I currently use these patches: Patch1: 0001-Modify-init-scripts-for-better-Fedora-compatibility.patch Patch2: 0002-Modify-modules.conf-so-that-different-voicemail-modu.patch Patch5: 0005-Build-using-external-libedit.patch Patch6: 0006-Revert-changes-to-pbx_lua-from-rev-126363-that-cause.patch Patch8: 0008-change-configure.ac-to-look-for-pkg-config-gmime-2.4.patch Patch10: 0010-my-guess-as-replacements-for-the-missing-broken-stuf.patch Patch11: 0011-Fix-up-some-paths.patch Patch12: 0012-Add-LDAP-schema-that-is-compatible-with-Fedora-Direc.patch I have changed some of the patches a little compared to the 1.6.1rc1 versions, just to make them apply. I have removed chan_mobile; if upstream prefers it to be in asterisk-addons, it seems a bit futile to keep trying to patch it in. I should probably drop Patch 6; if upstream hasn't dropped it in 6 months then it's probably something we have to live with. Not that I use Lua. Patches 2, 5, 8, and 12 ought to go upstream... /Benny -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
