On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 05:10:58PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > On Wednesday 26 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix > > proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set > > in the testing repository: > > OK, I have finally installed texlive on F11. With this update all worked (with > the exception of some quirks already reported in this list). Unfortunately in > the end I had a non working latex. It was likely caused by the missing texlive-latex provides. It should be fixed with the current package set. > > Making this story short for some reason texlive-latex was not installed when I > had update the system. Installing it fixed the problem. Does it make sense to > have the latex packages depending on this? The main "texlive" package now contains a dependency to texlive-latexrecommended so all the LaTeX recomended stuff should be pulled in automatically when just installing "texlive". Jindrich > > > Thanks, > > Jindrich > > Thanks for the hard, :-) > > -- > José Abílio > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx> http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
