Re: Triggers just to avoid unowned directories?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 11:10 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 09/01/2009 09:34 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > rpm could start refcounting directories any day now and that'd be just
> > fine.
> 
> Is there an open trac ticket on this issue with the RPM upstream?

Not that I can see.  I had assumed their trac was more or less moribund,
since things like %{patches} and prov/req filtering have been
implemented but are still open tickets, but I guess we have those
implemented in redhat-rpm-macros and not rpm proper.

I'd kind of like to have a complete idea of how automatic-dirs would
behave though.  What happens when an autodir is on the filesystem and a
new package comes along to explicitly own it, possibly with different
permissions?  Does it revert when that package is uninstalled?  Do
autodirs containing only .rpm{new,save} after package removal get
garbage collected?  etc.

- ajax

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux