Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 09:27:10AM +0200, Stefan Grosse wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:16:33 +0200 Stefan Grosse
> <singularitaet@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> SG> dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 von installed hat
> SG> Abhängigkeitsauflöse-Probleme --> Fehlende Abhängigkeit:
> SG> libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von Paket
> SG> dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 (installed) Fehler: Fehlende
> SG> Abhängigkeit: libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von Paket
> SG> dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 (installed)
> 
> Just for the record: This was caused by LyX being (still) dependent on
> dvipdfm. Deleting LyX made an installation possible.

This should be fixed with the new packages in the repository now.

The new packages obsolete the ancient tetex stuff:
tetex-tex4ht
tetex-IEEEtran
tetex-bytefield
tetex-elvevier
tetex-perltex
tetex-prosper

and these utilities:
dvipdfm
dvipdfmx
dvipng
xdvi
xdvipdfmx

Installation of LyX/dvipdfm, etc. should work fine now.

Jindrich

> 
> Cheers
> Stefan.
> 
> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx>   http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux