On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:26 AM, drago01<drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Colin Walters<walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:49 PM, drago01<drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Colin Walters<walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Hi internets, >>>> >>>> I was looking at the current state of ABRT (I tested on F11). The >>>> core capturing seems to work well. In brief, I propose to apply the >>>> (attached) patch to comps-f12.xml.in. >>>> >>>> For upgrades, we'll need to add a Conflicts: bug-buddy, correct? >>> >>> No, you want Obsoletes: bug-buddy, so yum/anaconda will replace >>> bug-buddy with abrt. >> >> Ok, thanks. Should then the current >> >> %package addon-kerneloops >> [...] >> Conflicts: kerneloops >> >> Also be changed to Obsoletes? > > Yes a conflict will just prevent it from getting installed when > kerneloops is installed. (which is kinda useless and not what was > intended here) > Obsoleting a specific version would be even better: > Obsoletes: kerneloops <= lastestversion But do we even want to drop kerneloops from the distro? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
