Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 02:09:59PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> Error: Missing Dependency: tetex-fonts is needed by package 
> a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64 (installed)
> Error: Missing Dependency: tetex >= 3.0 is needed by package 
> jadetex-3.13-5.fc11.noarch (installed)
> Error: Missing Dependency: tetex is needed by package texinfo-
> tex-4.13a-2.fc11.x86_64 (installed)
> Error: Missing Dependency: libkpathsea.so.4()(64bit) is needed by package 
> evince-dvi-2.26.2-1.fc11.x86_64 (installed)
> 
> Suggestions?

I have succeessfully reproduced the a2ps problem and I'm still not
sure about a solution. Installing texlive and a2ps in separate
transactions worked for me fine without any depsolving problems. So
you can use at least this workaround.

Installation of jadetex should now be fixed now as well as texinfo-tex.

The evince-dvi is unfortunately unfixable because it needs rebuild for
the increased libkpathsea soname.

Jindrich

> 
> Jindrich Novy wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
> > proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set
> > in the testing repository:
> > 
> > rpm -i
> > http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-
> release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
> > 
> > If you use the older TeX Live 2009 packages, please reinstall them
> > completely:
> > 
> > yum remove texlive
> > (and to be sure rm -rf /usr/share/texlive, due to ordering it could
> > leave some directories there)
> > yum clean all
> > yum install texlive <or other packages>
> > 
> > The reason for it is the following list of improvements:
> > - binary packages do no more have the '.ARCH' postfix, the postfix
> >   changed to '-bin'
> > - new font support add new 'fedora-fonts' packages which allows you to
> >   use TeX Live 2009 fonts (TrueType and OpenType for now) in Fedora
> > - packages for TeX Live t1utils and psutils are no more built but
> >   dependencies to existing utilities in Fedora are added
> > - kpathsea packages should now be correctly obsoleted. The
> >   lcdf-typetools dep errors you might see installing
> >   texlive-collection-fontutils is caused by the fact that
> >   lcdf-typetools in Fedora is linked against kpathsea libraries and
> >   TeX Live 2009 increases the soname so lcdf-typetools will work after
> >   rebuilt with the new kpathsea
> > - fixed texlive-xetex conflict with older TL2007 packages
> > - added older tetex-latex, etc. provides for compatibility (you are
> >   now able to install TL2009 together with R analysis package, etc.)
> > - new packages should automatically clear /var/lib/texmf in %post
> >   scriptlets to avoid format incompatibilities
> > 
> > I haven't added obsoletes to .ARCH packages to keep spes files
> > readable and because TL2009 packages are not yet imported.
> > 
> > The spec format should be final now. Only some font formats can be
> > added or the Fedora font support updated for a bit.
> > 
> > I will announce next repo updates here:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/TeXLive
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Jindrich
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx>   http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux