On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Matthias Clasen<mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Using those criteria, 10 slots are quickly filled: I think this underscores the problem with this approach. It's quite arbitrary. It's more about about PR than about discoverability or relevance to any particular user or usage case. "Hey drive-by end users with minimal to no knowledge of linux! Look we have big name open source applications in our repository that you can also install on Windows! We are relevant! We are relevant!" "Hey developers! Hey look here are a few developer focused applications we want to pimp because we are heavily involved in the upstream project!" "Hey look everyone! A game! We have games!" If its meant to be a teaser...lets make sure we are upfront about that and lets avoid any sort of language which would imply a ranking. There's no "top 10"-ness to the list you propose. Its a feature bulletpoint list like you see in a sales pitch slidedeck. I have no problem with a hand built ten item list. Let's just be upfront about what the list represents. Such a list is a best a teaser...deliberately designed to draw casual website travellers in and explore the repository offerings on your own. -jef"Can we turn the repository into a web based game? Sort of like 'new adventure shell' did for the shell interface? Can we have adventure repository?"spaleta -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
