On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 13:55 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > 2) General purpose OS + release set versus targeted OS: Basically, do > you block (or even slow) the release on a bug in say rsync or ocaml > even if those things aren't dependencies of the UI or (any > interesting) apps? This is touching on Critical Path. The direction I think we're going is that the release only cares about Critical Path and the accepted Features. We only block/slow the release for issues there, and everything else doesn't matter. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
