Re: rpms/nss-softokn/devel nss-softokn-3.12.3.99.3-stripped.tar.bz2, NONE, 1.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:32:11 -0700, Elio wrote:

> Conrad,
> 
> You are right.  By reading at Makefile.common it seems that "make 
> new-source nss-softokn-3.12.3.99.3-stripped.tar.bz2"
> would be the way to place them in the lookaside cache (after I do the 
> cvs remove on them).

The nss/nss-softokn packages likely would benefit from a careful
review. Many enabled explicit Conflicts, many explicit Requires and
Provides which are commented out. Provides with >= version range.
Even explicit Provides for SONAMEs (!). This is scary. Such lines
in a spec file ask for comments in the spec file.

Many "/sbin/ldconfig >/dev/null 2>/dev/null" calls in shell scriptlets
(is there strange documentation somewhere that tells a packager to do it
that way?).

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux