On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 03:07:19PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jindrich Novy wrote: > > Nope, it is intentional. It is needed to somehow distinguish the > > noarch and arch-dependent part. So package texlive-csplain contains > > the noarch bits and texlive-csplain.ARCH ships the binaries. > > Wouldn't texlive-csplain-libs or texlive-csplain-bin be more compliant to > our guidelines? The .ARCH postfix is actually derived from the TL metadata dependencies but indeed it doesn't look so good. The '-libs' is not appropriate as only binaries which go to /usr/bin are packaged. I will switch to the '-bin' postfix in the next build. Jindrich > > Kevin Kofler > > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx> http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
