On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:10 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:48:49PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > It seems your spec making program has some bugs, as some packages have
> > names such as texlive-csplain.ARCH, this probably shouldn't be..?
>
> Nope, it is intentional. It is needed to somehow distinguish the
> noarch and arch-dependent part. So package texlive-csplain contains
> the noarch bits and texlive-csplain.ARCH ships the binaries.
Wouldn't it be better to have texlive-csplain%{_isa} shipping the arch
dependent bits and a texlive-csplain-common.noarch shipping the arch
independent stuff? That would be more in line with other packages.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
