Re: Confusion with openal-soft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> Pushing openal-soft info F-11/F-10 is a violation of the Fedora
> updating policy.

It's not. It's entirely acceptable to bump a soname if there's a good reason 
to and dependent packages WILL have to get rebuilt. It would be impossible 
to update something like xulrunner for security fixes otherwise.

That said, in this case, IMHO there are too many dependent packages to force 
such a global rebuild.

        Kevin Kofler


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux