On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 09:57 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch > >> is below and feedback is welcome. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Peter > >> > >> + <packagelist> > >> + <packagereq type="mandatory">mutter</packagereq> > >> + <packagereq type="mandatory">mutter-moblin</packagereq> > >> + </packagelist> > > > > Speaking of these two, any reason mutter-moblin does not currently > > require moblin? (And when it's fixed, is it better to list both mutter > > and mutter-moblin, or let depsolving pull in mutter?) > > There is no "moblin" package as such. In fact mutter-moblin is the > main desktop env package. Ah, I meant listing both mutter and mutter-moblin, rather than just mutter-moblin. Slip of the fingers, when both parts of the name starts with the same letter and have the same length! -- Michel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
