Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/20/2009 04:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:

>> Is it just me or are there some packages that seem to be eternally on
>> this list? beage/f-spot/tomboy never seem to go anywhere.
> 
> They're eternally broken on ppc64.  Mostly due to Mono being broken on ppc64.
> 
It should be the opposite.  Mono runs on ppc64 but some maintainers need
to update the ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch that is preventing their
packages from being built on ppc64.  Once those packages are fixed,
their dependent packages will be able to run as well.

I'll go through and start updating packages to stop excluding ppc64
since I'm tired of seeing mschwendt's report be ignored.  However,
people who really care about mono need to step up and start taking care
of this stuff.  I don't own or use any mono packages and I'm not happy
with the patent licenses so I don't want to keep working on these packages.

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux