2009/8/20 Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> >> Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora >> because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest >> packages and will likely be released this year. And before that we can >> help with testing :) > > One more issue: some packages (like R, for example) still depend on > "tetex-latex", which I guess used to be a virtual provide of texlive > but is now gone. What's the plan for dealing with this? > > Here's the full list of things that require tetex-latex according to repoquery: > > a2ps-0:4.14-8.fc11.x86_64 > asymptote-0:1.70-1.fc11.x86_64 > fig2ps-0:1.3.6-4.fc11.noarch > hevea-0:1.10-3.fc11.x86_64 > HippoDraw-0:1.21.1-9.fc11.x86_64 > ipe-0:6.0-0.29.pre30.fc11.x86_64 > jadetex-0:3.13-5.fc11.noarch > mediawiki-math-0:1.14.0-45.fc11.x86_64 > pdfjam-0:1.21-1.fc11.noarch > pyscript-0:0.6.1-4.fc11.noarch > R-devel-0:2.9.0-2.fc11.x86_64 > tetex-bytefield-0:1.2a-5.fc11.noarch > tetex-dvipost-0:1.1-10.fc11.x86_64 > tetex-elsevier-0:0.1.20071024-2.fc11.noarch > tetex-IEEEtran-0:1.7.1-2.fc11.noarch > tetex-perltex-0:1.7-2.fc11.noarch > tetex-prosper-0:1.5-5.fc11.noarch > texmaker-1:1.8-2.fc11.x86_64 These packages should be updated to require tex(latex). -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
