This would be ok if you never pushed it to updates-testing But if you do that it's logical for test-users that they can start testing and not getting 2.6.27 after that - Push it to updatestesting is like "go on" and after that step there should be no package-conflicts if they were THANK YOU for 2.6.29.6-97 today to help to solve my problems which are nearly killing me because i have no time and energy for downgrades 4 days before my healthy issues (medical operation) especially after working the last weeks day and night nearly to burn-out with other things which had to be done before > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:13:10AM -0500, Joe Nall wrote: > > One of the reasons we haven't pushed them as proper updates is that > getting the regressions fixed is pretty time consuming, and the limited > X/KMS manpower we have is better focused on making the F12 stuff work right, > and getting it upstream.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
