On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 00:30 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > On F-10/11 the whole rebuild is not preferable, however it seems that > actually openal-soft is also needed on F-10/11 to fix some bugs > (bug 515109). So on F-10/11, it was decided to make openal and > openal-soft installable in parallel (not making openal-soft obsolete > openal) and make openal-devel and openal-soft-devel in conflict (not > making openal-soft-devel obsolete openal-devel) to avoid mass rebuild. It's usually possible to have the devel packages co-exist by renaming the new library (make it libopenal-soft.so). This may require a small patch to any app you want to build against the new version (make it look for libopenal-soft instead of just libopenal), but I think this is preferable to conflicting -devel packages. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
