> I think there's a valid case for making an exception to this: when a > package is an accelerated version of a particular library. That is, > when the basic functionality of a library is available in a i686 > Fedora package, but a special SSEx version of the library makes use of > faster instructions. > > Andrew. Right now, there exist a number of packages which explicitly pull in atlas instead of the also available generic packages blas/lapack which do not exhibit these severe restrictions. Earlier versions of the Fedora atlas package actually supported a wider range of processors including even such offering 3dnow! and also plain x86. The current behaviour (code depending on lapack aborts because of illegal instructions) is a regression which has been introduced by the packager. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
