On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Bill Nottingham<notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Martin Langhoff (martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> To note: it _is_ reported as a 586, so at least ancillary work in >> yum/anaconda/rpm will be needed so that installing F12 on these >> "supported but not quite 686 CPUs" is possible, avoiding the hackery >> of installing it on a true 686 and then transferring the image to the >> XO. > > diff --git a/rpmrc.in b/rpmrc.in > index 4a6cca9..d62ddaf 100644 > --- a/rpmrc.in > +++ b/rpmrc.in > @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ arch_compat: alphaev5: alpha > arch_compat: alpha: axp noarch > > arch_compat: athlon: i686 > -arch_compat: geode: i586 > +arch_compat: geode: i686 > arch_compat: pentium4: pentium3 > arch_compat: pentium3: i686 > arch_compat: i686: i586 > > That should do the trick. :) I've just been testing this with my Fit-PC geode box and it hasn't made it into rawhide and hence doesn't work. I've filed a bug [1] and added it to the alpha blocker as its a pretty large miss for the x86 recompile feature. Peter [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517475 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list