Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Bill Nottingham<notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Martin Langhoff (martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx) said:
>> To note: it _is_ reported as a 586, so at least ancillary work in
>> yum/anaconda/rpm will be needed so that installing F12 on these
>> "supported but not quite 686 CPUs" is possible, avoiding the hackery
>> of installing it on a true 686 and then transferring the image to the
>> XO.
>
> diff --git a/rpmrc.in b/rpmrc.in
> index 4a6cca9..d62ddaf 100644
> --- a/rpmrc.in
> +++ b/rpmrc.in
> @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ arch_compat: alphaev5: alpha
>  arch_compat: alpha: axp noarch
>
>  arch_compat: athlon: i686
> -arch_compat: geode: i586
> +arch_compat: geode: i686
>  arch_compat: pentium4: pentium3
>  arch_compat: pentium3: i686
>  arch_compat: i686: i586
>
> That should do the trick. :)

I've just been testing this with my Fit-PC geode box and it hasn't
made it into rawhide and hence doesn't work. I've filed a bug [1] and
added it to the alpha blocker as its a pretty large miss for the x86
recompile feature.

Peter

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517475

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux