Joachim wrote: >> Quoting Bill Nottingham: >> >> Given the loud feedback, I've updated the proposal at: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F12X86Support >> >> The revised proposal: >> >> - Build all packages for i686 (this requires cmov) >> - Optimize for Atom > > I do not understand then, that there exist i686 packages which have > higher requirements. Look at the ATLAS library for which I had filed a > bug because only SSE/SSE2/SSE3 variants are provided, > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510498 , > > which got closed as CANTFIX. This implies that any program linked > against these libraries is likely to fail on Pentium Pro and Pentium > II systems, the first one being the archetype of the i686 platform. > Moreover, it is even pulled in by basic packages like gnome-games (!). >From reading the bugzilla, that looks to me like a bug upstream. The tail was "If you can create such architectural default let me know, and I'll use it." ... but none ever arrived ... Andrew. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
