Re: Cannot rely on /dev being present in %post scripts?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:18:16PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> According to bug #517013, %post scripts should not assume that /dev is
> available -- so we can't do anything that requires the existence of 
> /dev/null, /dev/urandom, etc.
> 
> Is this a known and expected packaging rule, or is it a bug in the way
> that the user is attempting to install the packages?

I mentioned it already in the bug report: There are some scriptlet
recommendations that use /dev/null:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets

Regards
Till

Attachment: pgpz8lE4bsbkM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux