On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 09:47 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:38:27PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> >On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 07:36 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:45:50AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> >> >Hi all,
> >> >
> >> >I'd like to upgrade OpenSSL to 1.0.0-beta3 version just after the F12
> >> >Alpha release. I asked rel-eng to create a custom build target for the
> >> >rebuild so we can avoid shipping the symlink hacks in rawhide.
> >>
> >> A few questions:
> >>
> >> Why a beta version?
> >Because the changes on the 1.0.0 branch will not break ABI as they will
> >be bugfix-only and it will allow us to upgrade to 1.0.0 later.
>
> Thanks for the quick response! One more question:
>
> Are we planning for a compat- package for the current OpenSSL version?
I currently do not plan it - we did not do it for recent OpenSSL soname
bumps either, however I would not object if anyone wants to make the
compat package.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
