Re: Consistent PolicyKit system policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Kevin Kofler<kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Colin Walters wrote:
>> Well, there are a variety of  technical approaches; maybe instead the
>> spin config is a desktop-spin-config RPM or something.  But the point
>> is that the CD downloaded from the website should be configured
>> appropriately for unmanaged (or really self-managed) systems, but we
>> need to be able to explain to administrators creating a managed
>> desktop environment how to configure things.  I think differentiating
>> on RPM defaults versus spin config is a relatively clean way to do
>> this, but other suggestions are welcome.
>
> That makes no sense. The default should be OK for all environments. And the
> current PackageKit setup works just fine for shared labs too.

Well, we're mainly limping along with the root password approach,
which is confusing for the unmanaged case.  Things will become more
different between the RPM config versus the desktop spin when that
goes away.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux