On Tuesday 11 August 2009 10:02:23 Steven Moix wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm facing a problem with one of my SPEC files...I'm packaging a program > (motion, in RPM Fusion) that has a startup script. In the start() > section of this startup script, I have added an > "LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libv4l/v4l2convert.so daemon $motion" to support > more cameras. You can patch your package to use libv4l directly. Usually it's easy - there are some issues but... Check some packages using v4l to check what you have to do to port it. Also check this blogpost by Hans de Goede (libv4l author) [1]. [1] http://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/3636.html Jaroslav > So I naturally added a "Requires: libv4l" in my SPEC file, but of course > rpmlint complains with "E: explicit-lib-dependency libv4l". > > The problem here is that I can't see how RPM could automatically add > libv4l as a dependency when I build the package...it's not in the code, > only a call in the startup script. So... > > * Should I consider that libv4l is installed by default on F10/11 and > not put the require. > * Put the require and let rpmlint complain. > > Any advice on that? > Note that if you launch the startup script on a system that doesn't have > libv4l, it simply doesn't do the LD_PRELOAD, but still works "as usual". > > Thanks > Steven -- Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 731 455 332 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
