>>>>> "SG" == Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: SG> It would have been in before feature freeze if sc-audit hadn't SG> gotten stuck in package review. A couple of points here, since you seem to be blaming the review process for the lateness of this package: Submitting a new package request and expecting it to be reviewed in under a week is simply not reasonable. Sorry, it just isn't. If reviews are going to be blocked on package reviews, get those reviews in early, not at the last minute. If something important, like a new feature or something disruptive like this is going to be held up by a package review but needs to get done by feature or alpha freeze time, please make an announcement to that effect, or at least indicate that in the review itself. The review in question (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514602) said nothing about this issue. Otherwise the reviewers have no idea that they should prioritize this review. People go on vacation occasionally, or run out of free time. As far as I know, nobody is paid to review packages and we all have other work to do. If an important review gets blocked behind someone who is not responding, let someone know about it. I stole and finished the xz review because it turns out the person doing the review went on vacation and the entire mass rebuild was blocked on us getting xz in. Bottom line: We can get things done when we know about them needing to get done. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
