Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 08/06/2009 09:12 PM, Matej Cepl wrote: > Do you expect people to continue a review even when you'd have to > decide against the best of your knowledge and conciousness? Actually, yes, I do. Your job is not to make packages perfect, but to check they follow Packaging Guidelines and other items as stated on the wiki. Of course, you can and you should express your opinion about any strategies and techniques they use (rerun autoconf or patch ./configure or libtool), but their disagreement with your opinion (and it is nothing else than one of two opinions on the matter) shouldn't be the reason why you reject the review approval. Do you go to the source code and check how well the upstream made the program? IMHO, the proper way is to express opinion, and even when disagreement happens, approve review and then file a bug against the package where you can fight your battle without threatening packager to disallow him to have a bug in the repo. Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list