On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:07:13PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > It's about not presenting bad UI and bad groups to our users - it's > > a design thing. > > I do not agree that my groups are bad or that they are bad by their > nature. Nevertheless, I do not see that this discussion is leading > anywhere, that will allow to fulfill my needs (Easy installation of the > software, easy finding of the software, allowing many people to do this > and not maintaining the same information in several places) and your > requests. Also it looks for me that you do not want these groups at any > cost, because of the way you argue. Thanks to Rahul, there may be a compromise that will be good enough for me and might to acceptable for you. 1) Create the groups with the it-security-prefix 2) Toggle uservisible to false 3) Do not add a category for the groups Then the exposure to uninterested users will be minimal, but interested users can still install the packages easily with 'yum install @it-sec*' and the search can maybe done with some yum plugin or a different application and the ifnromation is still managed centrally. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgpGHJ46V0Ubr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
