Re: Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 07:02 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> The feature process can be very forgiving when there is *information* on 
> the feature page about how "testable" a particular feature is or further 
> information what is left to be done past feature freeze.
> 
> I don't currently have the ability to know what every upstream project 
> is doing or know what every developer plans to do "real soon now" ;-) 
> Thus it helps to add it to the feature page :)
> 
> As a result my goal is to treat every feature page equally, using the 
> information that has been provided on each page, in light of the feature 
> process that everyone has agreed on.  As always, the feature process is 
> not written in stone and if there are ways the current process should be 
> amended or changed I'm sure FESCo would be open to constructive 
> suggestions to changing it and making it better.

From the sidelines it seems that there is a confusion on what the %
actually means.  Some think that 100% means "ready to be tested" and
others think that 100% means "It's been tested, the final builds are in
and all known and cared about bugs are fixed".

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux