On 08/06/2009 02:10 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 06.08.2009, 13:39 +0200 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
On 08/06/2009 12:32 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 10:44 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/06/2009 10:39 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
After requesting status updates, including direct email to the feature
owners, the following feature pages do not have a current status or their
ability to tested during the Alpha is unclear based on the lack of
information provided or percentage of completion.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraMoblin
I'm the maintainer of this. I think its very much in a similar
category to gnome/kde. The only difference is there is some packages
still awaiting review, about 2 that are actually critical, but moblin
2 like gnome etc are still in there development phase so its a moving
target.
IMO, this feature should be scratched, because the packages in question
are of immature nature (... and of low packaging quality from my POV).
"Low packaging quality"? I certainly don't think so, given the amount of
time Peter spent on them, and the fact that they all seemed good enough
to pass review.
Yes, they somehow sneeked through reviews. This doesn't invalidate what
I said.
It only proves my impression of Fedora quality standards being low and
about the quality of reviews.
Would you please be so kind and name names here?
> What packages and what
reviews are you talking about?
In this context, I am talking about all moblin package submissions by
Mr. Robinson.
I asked you to write down the problems
you found in bz and CC me, but so far I haven't received a mail.
I haven't received any mail from you.
> Instead
you spend time on writing mails with abstract accusations to the list.
Do you want me to flame people in public?
As you know I'm really interested in improving both the packaging and
the review quality and I appreciate your cooperation. Why not pick up
some of the reviews?
I did so, but Mr. Robinson refused to listen and preferred to go his
way, because "the fedora guidelines" allow him to do so. It cause me to
turn away from his reviews.
Ralf
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
