On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 12:17 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "JL" == Jussi Lehtola <jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > JL> (I'm not very sure, however, about the current policy of wanting > JL> sponsors to review first packages. IMHO anyone should be able to > JL> review them, just as long as a sponsor goes through them and some > JL> inofficial reviews by the submitter. It's less work for the sponsor > JL> that way :D) > > Anyone can review anything, sponsor, sponsored, or not a packager at > all. The difference is who can approve a package and sponsor > contributors. > > It is certainly quite reasonable for a non-sponsor to review that > package and get it into shape so that a sponsor can come along, double > check, and click the various buttons. That's what I think, too, but http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_Sponsored thinks otherwise: "First reviews for new packagers must be done by registered sponsors. Informal reviews can be done by anyone interested." Maybe that note should be removed? -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
