Le vendredi 31 juillet 2009 à 16:47 -0400, Josh Boyer a écrit : > On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:00:10AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >On 08/01/2009 01:31 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > >It is a random upstream project but one developed within Fedora and > >Fedora can and should tell them not to do so. Why shouldn't we? Again > >they don't need or deserve special exceptions. Treat them like any other > >upstream project. That is all I ask. > > No. That is part of the problem with your proposal. You have targetted RH > or Fedora packages that do this. If some other package only distributes via > SRPM (or .deb, or ebuild), they aren't required to comply. Why force these > RH/Fedora packages to do something that we don't force other packages to? Because we have higher standards and our « mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community. ». Providing easy to find code tarballs is part of making community collaboration easy. (You can provide other means but this is the minimum requirement) -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
