Re: More Fedora mock breakage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 18:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)" <bochecha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
> >> rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by exim-4.69-12.fc12.x86_64
> 
> > I had the same on F11, building in a Rawhide mock.
> 
> > I was advised to update rpm to 4.7.1 that was in updates-testing,
> > which fixed the problem.
> 
> [ consults CVS... ]  So XZ support in F-11's rpm is less than a week
> old, there is *no* support in F-10, and we're already requiring
> the capability in order to do useful development work?
> 
> All I can say is WTF.

An rpm with Xz support is in F11 updates-testing. I'm pretty sure it's
also in updates-testing for F10.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux