On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 06:48:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >"Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)" <bochecha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: >>> rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by exim-4.69-12.fc12.x86_64 > >> I had the same on F11, building in a Rawhide mock. > >> I was advised to update rpm to 4.7.1 that was in updates-testing, >> which fixed the problem. > >[ consults CVS... ] So XZ support in F-11's rpm is less than a week >old, there is *no* support in F-10, and we're already requiring >the capability in order to do useful development work? > >All I can say is WTF. Did you have a better plan for migrating to an XZ payload for F12 in time for Alpha? josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
