Re: Testing libsatsolver on Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 09:12:23AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 17:41 +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > Right, I meant conflicts between latest versions of packages in
> > all repositories.
> 
> We have that too, for the packages that explicitly mark themselves as
> conflicting.  We don't catch unmarked file conflicts until we've
> downloaded and attempt to install, and then it's caught by rpm.  Lots of
> multilib file coloring magic here.

Ok, I thought we have a policy that forbids it. So there is actually a
good reason why it should be supported by yum.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux